People in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

People in Organizations - quiz ExampleWe are all amateur psychologists, and the most successful influencers are able to assess accurately their target influencees, and adapt their influencing messages to suit them. such adjustments lead to the creation of influencer-influencee rapport. The conversation of raft who are in rapport flows, and both their body movements and their words become synchronized with each other. The recommendation to match the influencee so as to create rapport is itself based on the even broader notion of liking. This says that we ilk people like ourselves and, in consequence, will be more willing to comply with their requests (Aguinis, & Henle, 2001),.Not only do we go that people are different, but we also know that they are predictably different. Indeed, we spend a big(p) deal of our time classifying them into broad types, and explaining the differences between the types. Every popular newspaper contains an astrological section which implies that Capri corns deliver in one way and that Scorpios act in another. The twelve signs of the Zodiac represent one attempt at classifying people into nature types based on the time of the year in which they were born. How accurate or useful are they Historically, many attempts have been made to classify people according to their personalities. The Greek physician, Hippocrates, get rid ofered the temperaments model of reputation. He believed that there were four basic personalities or temperaments - melancholic, choleric, sanguine and phlegmatic. In his view, each was determined by the issue forth and type of bile and phlegm that people possessed in their bodies (Aguinis, & Henle, 2001). Distinguishing Between Personality Types If you are to contain a particular influencing approach on the basis of your target influencees personality, then the personality framework employed has to be both easy to understand and simple to use. You need to be able to divide people into a very limited numb er of personality types or classes, based on the personality traits that they possess. In modern times, Carl Gustav Jung was the first to observe that peoples behavior, rather than being individually unique, fitted into patterns, and that many of the seemingly random differences in human behavior were actually ordered and consistent (Lambert, 1996). It is patent that any attempt to reduce personality into only four categories inevitably ignores the subtlety of human differences. On the other hand, anything more complex is unusable by an influencer. For this reason, in using these four personality stereotypes, one is inevitably trading accuracy off against ease of use. The framework does allow you to classify the individual whom you may wish to influence in a simple way using your observation of their behavior and the examination of their created work or home environment. Such information can then be immediately put into practice. Personality TestingOne obvious way to understand th e relationship of individual differences to work-related behavior is to examine the applied literature on personality testing in the workplace. Psychological tests, attempting to measure individual differences related to occupational behaviors, have been used for all over 60 years, and there now exist nearly 80,000 occupational-related tests. Both world wars, particularly the second, were